Answer:
The needed help you need is right here: The author’s purpose for writing "Banksy and the Tradition of Destroying Art” is to inform readers how Banksy’s actions are similar to actions of other artists in history. Also, the author wants to inform readers about how, despite efforts to destroy art to show that some art should not have more value than other art, artists have actually increased the value of their art. This is because the destructive actions make collectors and the elite just compete more to acquire the desired pieces of art. Describing examples in art history and explaining the cause-effect relationship between the artists and the market supports the author’s purpose.
Explanation:
This is because The author’s purpose for writing "Banksy and the Tradition of Destroying Art” is to inform readers how Banksy’s actions are similar to actions of other artists in history. Also, the author wants to inform readers about how, despite efforts to destroy art to show that some art should not have more value than other art, artists have actually increased the value of their art. This is because the destructive actions make collectors and the elite just compete more to acquire the desired pieces of art. Describing examples in art history and explaining the cause-effect relationship between the artists and the market supports the author’s purpose.
Answer: Hope this helps.
Explanation: States still found ways to circumvent the Constitution and prevent blacks from voting. Poll taxes, literacy tests, fraud and intimidation all turned African Americans away from the polls. Until the Supreme Court struck it down in 1915, many states used the "grandfather clause " to keep descendents of slaves out of elections. The clause said you could not vote unless your grandfather had voted -- an impossibility for most people whose ancestors were slaves.
Answer:
A. Older siblings teaching younger siblings how to ride a bike.
Explanation:
Answer:
Simile ↔ C) My phone slipped through my fingers <u>like</u> butter.
Personification ↔ D) The <u>face</u> of my phone had many <u>scars</u> from being dropped.
Symbol ↔ A) I wanted to wave the <u>white flag</u> after searching for my phone.
Hyperbole ↔ E) My phone <u>is my lifeline</u> to the world.
Metaphor ↔ B) I wouldn't <u>trade</u> my phone <u>for a million </u><u>dollars</u>.
Explanation:
Whatever I underlined is supposed to hint at why each sentence matches the way it does.
For example: Similes compare ideas to each other, sort of like metaphors do, but they use the words "like" or "as" to do so.
Hope this makes sense :)
