Good example of appeasement being used is the Munich Conference (1938), and the Potsdam Conference (1945). Many see appeasement as surrendering to another country’s wishes, which can make a nation and its leader look weak. It’s a temporary measure taken to stop a war, but many times is unsuccessful in the long run. Leaders such as Neville Chamberlain and FDR used this strategy with Hitler and Stalin, who both took advantage of what they had been given. Appeasement can put a country in a weak position due to them losing territory, resources, etc. It’s a very diplomatic policy, but usually only curbs a threat for a short time. Hope this helped a little! :)
The correct answer is D) Indian Boarding Schools
The children were forced to adopt euro-american standards which forced them to abandon their cultural heritage in favor of what was described as proper civilized behavior.
Adam Smith (1723 – 1790) was a Scottish economist. He was deeply critical of Christianity because of his own observation of hypocrisy within Protestantism.
In 1759, Smith published The Theory of Moral Sentiments, which established Smith’s reputation in his own days, is concerned with the explanation of moral approval and disapproval. He based his explanation on sympathy as a fundamental human motive.
In 1776, he published The Wealth of Nations that became the foundation of modern economics.
There has been considerable controversy as how far there is contradiction between Smith’s emphasis on sympathy in his <em>Theory of Moral Sentiments</em> and the key role of self- interest in <em>The Wealth of Nations</em>.
Smith’s idea of letting an economy without government intervention, called today Laissez faire was not about the government granting special economic privileges to powerful manufacturers and merchants. Mercantile monopolists and their allies in Parliament today, are the great enemies of Smith’s “free market mechanism”.
Answer:
Explanation:
Geographic and economic factors that influenced westward movement
Population growth in the eastern states.
Availability of cheap, fertile land.
Economic opportunity, e.g., gold (California Gold Rush), logging, farming, freedom (for runaway slaves)
Answer:
California is much better within the United States than it would be in an independent country. Even if California has a great economy, it's not just about the economy to start a new country. Also, even if they wanted to, America wouldn't approve of it, in the end, California is an influential and important state to them.
Explanation:
Hope this helps 3>
