1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
krok68 [10]
3 years ago
6

Why is the concept of majority rule so important in a democracy?

History
1 answer:
sukhopar [10]3 years ago
5 0
So everybody can have their voice heard and have a vote in the matter
You might be interested in
How did the state of Georgia respond after the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Cherokee in Worchester v. Georgia? The state
user100 [1]
<span>The state started new negotiations with the Cherokee to reach compromise.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What factors would determine if a specific crop could be transplanted into a new region? In other words, what determines which c
Talja [164]

Answer:

Terrain, climate, soil properties, and soil water.

Explanation:

Environmental factors such as terrain, climate, soil properties, and soil water are the factors that determine a specific crop could be transplanted into a new region because the crop needs these factors for better growth and development. Climate is the major factor because different plants needs different type of climate so the crop fits only in that climate at which they have tolerance. If a plant have more water requirement does not survive in desert or arid climate.

6 0
3 years ago
The leaders of the US, USSR, and Great Britain said they wanted to cooperate, so why were negotiations at the Yalta and Potsdam
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:  Each country had its own agenda about the post-war world.

Context/explanation:

Churchill in particular, along with Roosevelt, pushed strongly for Stalin to allow free elections to take place in the nations of Europe after the war. At that time Stalin agreed, but there was a strong feeling by the other leaders that he might renege on that promise. The Soviets never did allow those free elections to occur. Later, Winston Churchill wrote, "Our hopeful assumptions were soon to be falsified." Stalin and the Soviets felt they needed the Eastern European nations as satellites to protect their own interests.   So one key point of disagreement between Stalin and the other two was over the direction things would take in Eastern Europe after the war.

While Winston Churchill and Franklin Delano Roosevelt were on the same page in many ways, there were also key differences between them.   As noted by The Churchill Project of Hillsdale College, "FDR, ever the optimist, believed (or wanted to believe) that Stalin could be convinced that the West was not committed to destruction of the Soviet regime."  Churchill had a much more skeptical view of Stalin and the Soviet Union and approached the relationship in a firmer fashion.  Roosevelt had hoped to continue cooperation with the USSR.  That changed under Truman, who took over the US Presidency after FDR's death.  Truman was strongly anti-communist in his stance.

Another difference between Roosevelt and Churchill pertained to colonialism and imperialism.  Again as noted by The Churchill Project:  "Over colonialism. Roosevelt firmly believed European colonialism had been a major cause of World War I, and that it had continued to be a source of international disputes and tensions before World War II. Churchill had sworn defend the realm, which, when he took office, included the British Empire."  As it happened, after World War II, colonialism's days were numbered and independence movements broke out around the world where imperial powers had dominated.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the role of the Protestant Reformation in the growth of the Scientific Revolution?
kirill [66]

Answer:

It weakened the power of the Catholic Church in Europe.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which was the most crucial turning point in world war 2 and why? ​
natka813 [3]

Answer:

Turning points during World War II are points when the momentum of the war significantly moved against the Axis Powers and are considered as milestones on the path to their defeat. The term has its origin in the war itself; several individuals, including Erwin Rommel and Winston Churchill referenced the idea of a turning point, or a 'beginning of the end'.There is no academic consensus on a singular turning point, but historians generally agree on a small handful.

can i have brainliest please

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Prior to the industrial revolution what was coal used for
    9·1 answer
  • Did the kind of music hippies listen to influnce them or did the vietnam war
    7·1 answer
  • What was significant about the presidential election of 1936?
    15·1 answer
  • How did Japan and Ethiopia survive not becoming a colonized country?
    6·1 answer
  • It took approximately how many years for Stonehenge to be built? 2,000 500 1,000 1,400
    14·2 answers
  • I literally just caught a guy cheating oop-
    12·2 answers
  • Plz hurry plzz Motezuma II did not attack Cortes because
    9·1 answer
  • In your own words, what is the Social Contract Theory?
    12·1 answer
  • Which word best describes President Kennedy's initial approach to civil rights issues?
    10·2 answers
  • Complete the sentence: Patricians belonged to the ___________________, while plebeians were the ___________________.​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!