♫ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~Hello There!~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ♫
➷ Only the second one because only that one has -5, 5 going through it
✽
➶ Hope This Helps You!
➶ Good Luck (:
➶ Have A Great Day ^-^
DOGE
Answer:
a) x=7
b) x=4
c) x= 1/9
I hope this helps! Do you need more help?
Answer:
(0,0) and (7,10)
Step-by-step explanation:
recall that the slope - intercept form of a linear equation can be given as
y = mx + b
where m = slope and b = y intercept
in our case, we are given that slope, m = 10/7, hence our equation becomes
y = (10/7) x + b
since we are not given any information about the y-intercept, we can simply pick a value for b that is most convenient for us.
We pick b = 0, hence the equation simplifies to:
y = (10/7) x ----- eq 1
we can see immediately that if x = 0, y must also = 0
proof if x = 0:
y = (10/7)(0) =0
since 0 is an integer, then (0,0) must be the first point.
we can also observe that for y to be an integer, we must get rid of the denominator 7. We can do this by multiply the right side by 7. Hence we let x = 7:
y = (10/7) x 7
y = 10
hence (7,10) is the second point.
He drove 178 miles in the afternoon. 248-70=178
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that for a biology project, you measure the weight in grams and the tail length in millimeters of a group of mice.
The correlation is r = 0.9
If you had measured tail length in centimeters instead of millimeters, what would be the correlation?
For this we must understand the meaning of correlation and formula
Correlation is a measure of linear association between the two variables and always lie between -1 and 1
This is got by dividing covariance of (x,y) by product of std deviation of x and y
So because we changed the units of length correlation coefficient would not change.
It would remain the same as 0.90
