B. Another view of the argument
Logging trees can be a highly controversial subject. On one hand, it provides our species with the resources we are accustomed to using in order to prosper and survive. However on the other hand, with each tree that is removed, countless living creatures lose their homes and have nowhere to go. The noise and commotion from this can cause others to leave simply because they are scared. Fire can benefit a forest by leaving room for regrowth and younger trees, but it kills so many animals that are a part of the very food web we depend on and are a part of. With more people, we need more jobs which is less money to go around, leading to poverty, and logging trees provides jobs. Older forests have been there longer and have housed living things for a long time, as well as the fact that the are stronger than young trees they can be much bigger and therefore provide much more oxygen and refuse the amount of carbon dioxide in the air. Clear cutting is much more destructive because selective cutting is less harmful to less creatures and we can pick trees that will benefit us the most. Should there ever be a flood, the less trees and other plants there are in the ground, the more soil will be displaced and the bigger mess there will be to clean up.
Answer:
B) Nina is trying to raise her grade in American History from a B+ to an A.
Explanation:
The question asked for a present goal. Option B is the only one in present tense.
Answer:
i say somewhere out of the way and hidden.
Explanation:
She will be safe if they did that :)
