a. The probability that a student goes to seek for minor clarification from the professor during office hours = 6%.
b. The probability that a student goes to the professor for major clarification = 14%.
Data and Calculations:
Percentage of students in the class who go to the professor to seek clarifications = 20% (a)
Percentage of students in the class who do not go to the professor to seek clarifications = 80% (100% - 20%) (b)
Percentage of (a) who seek minor clarification = 30%
Percentage of (a) who seek major clarification = 70%
Probability of (a) seeking minor clarification = 6% (20% x 30%)
Probability of (a) seeking major clarification = 14% (20% x 70%)
Thus, the probability of students seeking minor clarification is 6% while the probability of students seeking major clarification is 14%.
Learn more about probability at brainly.com/question/13604758
Answer and Explanation:
According to the scenario, computation of the given data are as follow:-
Price ceiling:-This is show the limit of the price on maximizing value of the product which is decided by government and his imposed group for customer.
Binding:-The binding price ceiling is below the equilibrium price.
Unbinding:-The unbinding price ceiling is above equilibrium price.
Price floor:-This is show the limit of the price on lower value of the product which is decided by government and his imposed group for customer. A price floor must be higher than the price equilibrium price in order to be effective.
Binding:-The binding price floor is above the equilibrium price.
Unbinding:-The unbinding price floor is below the equilibrium price.
It is given that the equilibrium price of milk is $2.50 per gallon.
Statement 1:-This is the example of price floor and binding because minimum price of $2.30 per gallon is decided.
Statement 2:-This is the example of price floor and binding because minimum price of $3.40 per gallon is decided for gasoline.
Statement 3:-This is the example of price floor and binding because teenagers are not hired due to minimum-wage laws.
Answer:
i think it is the 3rd one I'm not sure but I need help on one of mine and it would be really good if you can help me I will appreciateit
Answer: Ralph does not have a good claim against Snowdrop, because age was not the deciding factor in Snowdrop’s decision to lay off Ralph.
Explanation: The reason for the firm laying off Ralph is vague and not explicitly stated. Therefore Ralph cannot make a claim against Snowdrop for laying him off due to his age.
Answer
The correct answer is c. $ 7,500.
Explanation:
The reconciliation of the change in fund balance in governmental fund financial statements to the change in net position for governmental activities in the government-wide financials is computed using the GOES BARE mnemonic. The fact pattern only describes measurement focus (GOES) issues computed as follows:
G Change in Governmental Fund Balance $ 1,500
O Other Financing Sources 0
E Expenditure - Capital Outlay 9,000
(net of depreciation) (3,000)
S Internal Service Fund Net Income 0
Change in Net Position in government
-wide financial statements $ 7,500
