1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
expeople1 [14]
3 years ago
13

What was the strategy of the north Vietnamese in the Vietnam war

History
2 answers:
Hatshy [7]3 years ago
8 0
Well it was more hit and run attacks this is why they had underground bases so they could hit the US or South Vietnamese troops then get back in the caves which allowed them to avoid the United States bomb and in the air it was very similar, they would have fighters ready to go and would only station them near important areas because they didn't have many fighters to challenge the US forces whenever they crossed the border. Instead they used SAM ( Surface to Air Missiles ) sites to defend these areas fighters would be to risky to use.
lyudmila [28]3 years ago
6 0
The North Vietnamese strategy (before the U.S. pulled troops): guerrilla warfare and traps

The North Vietnamese strategy (after the U.S. pulls troops): organized warfare with tanks, infantry
You might be interested in
What is the meaning of the suffix –logy? Some examples include theology, astrology, and biology.
8_murik_8 [283]
Science of, study of
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In West Virginia the _______________ keeps the official records of each county
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:

the County Clerk

Explanation:

Clerk of the County Commission, the Clerk's office is the “official record keeper” of the county; recording official copies of a wide range of documents including births, marriages, deaths, wills, deeds, mortgages, releases and many more.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What message about modern America is Miranda sending by having only people of color play the roles of the white founding fathers
Amiraneli [1.4K]

Answer:

  • <em>He sent a message that blacks also are humans. they can do things white's can do!</em>
  • <em>It's like the opposite now, because there were mostly white now there are mostly people of color.</em>
  • <em>Having all the actors be people of color sends the message that America's strength is </em><u><em>of color.</em></u><em> </em>

Explanation:

  • <em>Miranda is familiar with racial dynamics when it comes to the world of theater.  He was born in New York, but his family is from Puerto Rico and Mexico. At some point, Miranda started writing his own work just to carve out a lane for himself.  “I was in college, and I realized I didn’t dance well enough to play Paul in ‘A Chorus Line’ nor Bernardo, and if you’re a Puerto Rican dude, that’s what you get,” Miranda said. “So I began writing ‘In the Heights’ because I wanted a life in this business.”  But back to “Hamilton.” </em><em>In other words, He sent a message that blacks are also humans. they can do things white's can do!</em>
  • <em>Most Americans (65%) – including majorities across racial and ethnic groups – say it has become more common for people to express racist or racially insensitive views since Trump was elected president. A smaller but substantial share (45%) says this has become more acceptable. </em><em>It's like the opposite now, because there were mostly white now there are mostly people of color.</em>
  • <em>The racial stereotypes of early American history had a significant role in shaping attitudes toward African-Americans during that time. Images of the Sambo, Jim Crow, the Savage, Mammy, Aunt Jemimah, Sapphire, and Jezebelle may not be as powerful today, yet they are still alive. </em><em>Having all the actors be people of color sends the message that America's strength is </em><u><em>of color.</em></u><em> </em>
5 0
3 years ago
Is America a land of liberty ? Why?
Alex Ar [27]
NO OTHER country puts as much emphasis on “freedom” as the United States. Patrick Henry demanded “liberty or death”. The national anthem calls America “the land of the free”. Great reformers from Abraham Lincoln to Martin Luther King have urged America to live up to its ideal of “freedom”. When a group of French Americanophiles wanted to flatter the United States, they sent the Statue of Liberty.

And no other country boasts as much about its mission to give freedom to the rest of the world. Woodrow Wilson thought that he had a God-given duty to bring liberty to mankind. George Bush regards his foreign policy as a crusade for freedom—“the right and hope of all humanity”.

But how good is America at living up to its own ideals? A new study by Freedom House tries to answer this question. The fact that Freedom House has devoted so much attention to the United States is significant in its own right. Founded in 1941 by a group of Americans who were worried about the advance of fascism, Freedom House is now the world's leading watchdog of liberty. The fact that “Today's American: How Free?” is such a thorough piece of work makes it doubly significant.

The judicious tone of “How Free?” will undoubtedly disappoint leftists. Freedom House bends over backwards to give the authorities the benefit of the doubt. Other countries have recalibrated the balance between freedom and security in the face of terrorists who want to inflict mass casualties on civilians. America's recent sins, however, are minor compared with those of its past. Newspapers have published highly sensitive information without reprisals. Congress and the courts have repeatedly stepped in to restore a more desirable constitutional balance.

But the verdict on the Bush years is nevertheless sharp. “How Free?” not only details and condemns the administration's familiar sins, from Guantánamo to extraordinary rendition to warrantless wiretapping. It reminds readers of its aversion to open government. The number of documents classified as secret has jumped from 8.7m in 2001 to 14.2m in 2005—a 60% increase over three years. Decade-old information has been reclassified. Researchers report that it is much more difficult and time-consuming to obtain information under the Freedom of Information Act.

Government whistleblowers have repeatedly been punished or fired—even when they have been trying to expose threats to national security that their bosses preferred to overlook. Richard Levernier had his security clearance revoked for revealing that some of the country's nuclear facilities were not properly secured. Border security agents have been punished for pointing out that the border is inadequately monitored, and airport baggage-handlers and security people for pointing to weaknesses in the security system. The Office of Special Counsel, which was established to enforce laws designed to protect the rights of such people, is widely regarded as “inept and even hostile to whistleblowers”.

“How Free?” also has some hard things to say about America's criminal-justice system. The incarceration rate exploded from 1.39 per 1,000 in 1980 to 7.5 in 2006, driven, among other things, by the war on drugs. America now has one of the highest rates of imprisonment in the world: 5.6m Americans, or one in every 37 adults, has spent time behind bars. Even though prison-building is one of the country's great growth industries, overcrowding is endemic, with federal prisons operating at 131% of capacity. America is also one of the few countries to ban felons and, in some states, ex-felons from voting. At any one time 4m Americans—one in every 50 adults—is disenfranchised because of past criminal convictions. This includes 1.4m blacks, or 14% of the black male population.

Freedom House's strictures are, if anything, too soft. America insists on criminalising victimless crimes such as prostitution. Last week Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the so-called DC Madam, committed suicide; the government had thrown the book at her, including racketeering and mail fraud, because it really wished to penalise the arranging of assignations between consenting adults. In her suicide note to her mother she wrote that she could not “live the next six-to-eight years behind bars for what you and I have both come to regard as this 'modern-day lynching'.”

5 0
3 years ago
Did the rise of napoleon contribute to the rise of democracy
victus00 [196]
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is it called when the media puts a potentially negative facts in a favorable light?
    15·2 answers
  • How was george washington able to endear himself to his troops? what made him such a dynamic leader?
    15·1 answer
  • Government has encouraged religion in the United States in all of the following ways except
    5·1 answer
  • Which group of people suffered 6 million deaths during the holocaust?
    13·1 answer
  • A key factor of the empires the United States and European countries built in the late 1800s was:
    7·2 answers
  • Explain 2 important uses of the steam engine?
    15·1 answer
  • Compare Reagan's and Gorbachev's leadership styles and policy stances by dragging the descriptor tiles to the appropriate locati
    7·2 answers
  • How would the threat of nuclear attacks increase the fear of the "Red Scare?
    10·2 answers
  • Review the detail from Twelfth Night, Act I.
    6·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of the conclusion in an informative essay?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!