The standard for evaluating sources has been matched with their descriptions as follows:
- Trustworthiness: The issue is addressed from a balanced and fair viewpoint.
- Relevance: The text gives information related to your topic.
- Authority: The writer of the text has experience or expertise on the topic.
- Currency: The information is up-to-date.
<h3>What are the standards for evaluating sources?</h3>
The standards for evaluating sources are the benchmarks that are used to proof articles for accuracy.
Before the information contained in a material can be accepted, the content should be free from bias. It should also be relevant and come from a credible and reliable source.
Learn more about the evaluation of sources here:
brainly.com/question/11916196
#SPJ1
Answer:
Amen
Explanation:
(no joke I lost 3 brain cells reading that)
The rhetorical device is used in the given sentence is, chiasmus.
Because A rhetorical device is a strategy used by authors or speakers to persuade readers or listeners to evaluate an issue from a particular perspective. It involves employing language that is intended to stimulate an emotive presentation of a particular perspective or action. Through the use of language, rhetorical devices can elicit an emotional response in the audience, although that is not their main goal.
Chiasmus, also known as chiasm, is the "reversal of grammatical structures in successive phrases or clauses - but no repetition of words" in rhetoric. The chiasmus has an effect. In addition to helping you communicate more with less, it draws attention to notions or ideas that are frequently used but contradict each other. With such a limited language, it serves as a "catchphrase" and catches the substance of a statement.
To know more about chiasmus:
brainly.com/question/2054931
#SPJ4
Answer:
Unintentional betrayal can lead to severe consequences.
Explanation:
edgenuity
<span>Its personification because u r giving the snow human fetures</span>
