The excerpts which best sets the groundwork for his argument from precedent is; Choice B;
- Pitcairn, the uninhabited island settled in 1790 by the HMS Bounty mutineers, had actually been populated by the Polynesians 800 years earlier
<h3>Diamonds article: Argument</h3>
Diamond's op-ed simply offers an analysis of why civilizations collapse. It is an essay obviously intended to make readers ask, "Does our civilization have what it takes to survive?"
Front the Op-ed;
"In this fresh year, with the United States seemingly at the height of its power and at the start of a new presidential term, Americans are increasingly concerned and divided about where we are going. How long can America remain ascendant?
Read more on argument from precedent;
brainly.com/question/877736
The correct inference of the given passage from "The
Cask of Amontillado”, "Enough," he said; "the cough's a
mere nothing; it will not kill me. I shall not die of a cough."<span> "true --true," I replied.” would be Montresor,
not the cough, will kill Fortunato.</span> The correct answer
between all the choices given is the second choice. I am hoping that this
answer has satisfied your query about and it will be able to help you, and if
you’d like, feel free to ask another question.
Hard choosing from "A" to "D", but my best answer that I came up with is "D" or "4"
The word "Who's" is a plural and actual stands for "Who is" So if you put that in that sentence "Who is book about blue whales is this?" Or for "2" the word "Whomever's" doesn't make since in the sentence.. "Whomever's book about blue whales is this?" And the same with "3". But with "4" "Whose" It fits in that sentence.. "Whose book about blue whales is this?" It's best if you read the sentence out loud and see which word best fits in that sentence.
Answer:
they are koreans . because of their almond eyes and glass skin .... very attrative
<span>Valjean's appearance is tattered and poor
I think that's your answer</span>
