<em><u>Answer:</u></em>
- They threw dinner parties with dishes printed with a slave on them.
- They stopped buying sugar and cotton.
<em><u>Explanation:</u></em>
Despite the fact that slavery was adequately illicit in England from 1772 and in Scotland from 1778, battles to abrogate both the exchange and the organization have proceeded from that point onward. Women took an interest in the crusade from its start and were bit by bit ready to move from the private into the political field as procedures changed.
In the early years, women impacted the battle to cancel bondage, yet they were not immediate activists. This agreed with the predominant perspective on women as a good not a political power. As the crusade picked up notoriety, numerous women - running from the Whig privileged person, Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire, to the Bristol milk-lady Ann Yearsley - distributed abolitionist subjection poems and stories.
Women were as yet quick to blacklist sugar delivered on ranches utilizing slave work and, presently they were sorted out, they were progressively ready to advance neighborhood crusades.
Answer:
font open the link it is bad
Answer:
1. the ottoman empire formed
2. mehmed ii became sultan
3. the ottomans conquered Constantinople
4. Sulleyman I gained land in Europe
There could be several options for answering that question. I'd say one area of strength for the Articles of Confederation was that they encouraged coordinated, cooperative action between the states to resolve any disputes between the states. Another strength might be the establishment of a Department of the Treasury and Department of Postal Service so that money could be coined and mail service provided.
Meanwhile, there were also weaknesses, such as each state got only one vote, regardless of the size of the state. Also, each state could tax trade from other states -- there was no authority in the Confederation to regulate interstate commerce.
Differences between culture and architecture
