The advantage that the Mamluk horses have over the Mongol horses was that the Mamluk horses had horseshoes, while the Mongol horses did not have horse shoes. In reality the Mongols had numerous number of horses and it was next to impossible to provide all the horses with horse shoes. It was a disadvantage, but they had no other option.
The statement that offers the best description is that they were battling on us territory which makes it easier for americans.
D I don’t know for sure but I hope it’s d
PROS
<span>Fat Pay Cheques </span>
<span>Change in lifestyle for the better </span>
<span>Chances of going abroad </span>
<span>CONS </span>
<span>Pay cuts due to recession </span>
<span>Loss of jobs due to market slowdown </span>
<span>Depression from long work hours </span>
<span>Family tensions as work hours take a toll on relationships
your very welcome
</span>
Answer:
In America, the presidential election system is not through the direct vote of the citizenry, but through the indirect election carried out by the Electoral College. Thus, each voting citizen gives his cast to a specific candidate, but said will must be endorsed by the electors of his state in the Electoral College.
In this regard, each state has the number of voters equal to the number of congressmen it has in the federal Congress. Thus, for example, states like Montana or Alaska have 3 electors (since they have 2 senators and 1 representative), while California has 55.
The problem is that, to determine the electoral votes of each candidate, it has been established that whoever wins the popular votes in the state takes all the votes of the electors of that state (except in the case of Maine and Nebraska). For this reason, it may happen that a candidate in California defeats his opponent 50.1% to 49.9%, in what would be almost a technical tie, but takes 100% of the electoral votes. Thus, the right of citizens to the election of their representatives is violated, and a candidate who has not obtained the majority of the popular vote (as happened in 2016 with Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton) could win in the Electoral College.
Thus, many candidates adopt the strategy of campaigning and giving all their effort in the states with the largest number of voters such as California, Texas, Florida or New York, leaving aside other states considered less important.
