It is true however it can have two or more parts.
The feature of static visual is that they are used to grab your audience's attention.
Static visuals, similar to photos, are more compelling at staying in the watcher's mind, since they are not continually evolving. Visuals ought to have restricted content, except if showing insights, as an excessive number of words debilitate the effect of your message.
Static visuals ought to be utilized while exhibiting measurements. At the point when information is displayed in a video, data is excessively brief for the mind, making it impossible to process. Like promotions, static visuals go about as data sheets that show prove or convey a philosophy. Not at all like static visuals, moving visuals are eye catching. Short clasps and activitys have the ability to be more provocative than static visuals.
Yes cause they have the best way to experience different places An pretty pic
