Answer:
Number of car washed is 92
So option (a) is correct answer
Explanation:
It is given that 4 workers can wash 80 cars per day
Means initially 80 cars are washed per day
And it is given that rate of car wash is $5 per car
Now price of workers is $60 per day
As per car wash is $5
So number of extra car washed 
So total number of car washed = 80 + 12 = 92 cars per day
So option (a) is correct answer
Answer:
All the options given are examples of investment.
Explanation:
Savings are what an individual has left after their spending has been deducted from their disposable income. Savings can increase income by investing the money saved. Investment is an item or asset gotten with aim of generating income. An investment simply means buying goods that are not for immediate consumption but generation of income.
All the options provided are investment examples. A certificate of deposit is given by the bank to an individual after a certain amount of money has been deposited and it generates interest. Also building a cabin , a laboratory and buying stock are investments.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": There could be supplier interruptions due to political instability.
Explanation:
Single sourcing refers to a company deciding to choose one particular supplier -even if there are many options from where to select- because of a specific reason. The greater disadvantage of this situation is relying on one supplier for the manufacturing process which at a certain point could bring <em>instability </em>in front of different issues inherent or not to the supplier.
Answer:
b. debit warranty expense $10,000; credit estimated warranty liability $10,000
Explanation:
The journal entry to record the estimated warranty expense is shown below:
Warranty Expense Dr $10,000 ($200,000 × 5%)
To Estimated Warranty Liability $10,000
(being the warranty expense is recorded)
Here the warranty expense is debited as it increased the expense and credited the estimated warranty liability as it also increased the liability
Therefore the option b is correct
Answer:
The employer wins because he is acting on court orders.
Explanation:
Discrimination in the workplace is a punishable offense by the law. This act of promoting one female for every male promoted is a remedy to being found guilty of discrimination by the court.
In this case where he has been sued again for reverse discrimination, he (employer) is going to win this particular one because he was only acting on court order. The one female for every male was imposed on him by the court. So he is protected from this reverse discrimination accusations by his disgruntled employees.
