<em>Well, for one... Louis the XVI was considerd ineffectual because he was usually depicted as rather a weak sort of king. Not really able to wield the strong centralized state in which his ancestors had crafted.</em>
<em> *And he was also seen as an honest man, who had good intensions, but who was most likely unfit for the strong task of reforming the monarchy; He basically wasnt the best man for the job... </em>
<span><em>~Therefore, He was ineffectual, just like the question states...
</em><em>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</em>
<em>~Hope this helped! Anymore questions, please feel free to ask. :)</em></span>
history between the death of Alexander the Great in 323 BC and the emergence of the Roman Empire
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to attach the illustration and the options for this question. However, we can say the following.
The illustration shows a plan for the city of Washington from the late 1700s. What resulted from this plan was that "There were not enough funds for the federal government to create a national capital and pay its debts."
Here, we are talking about the plan known as the "L'Enfant Plan" of 1791. It was a plan to urbanize the zone of what today is Washington D.C. and was designed by a close man of United States President George Washington. His name was Pierre L'Enfant. He suggested that the new capital of the country could be located next to the Potomac River for the many advantages it generated for trade and as a means of transportation.
L'Enfant was a French architect that had known Washington during the years of the Continental Army that fought against the British troops during the Revolutionary War.
Emancipation Proclamation Results in Good News for African Americans!
<em>Their culture changed drastically in the early 16th century, when European newcomers introduced them to the horse. </em>The horse enabled them to travel much faster across greater distances which meant that they could follow and hunt buffalo more easily. Since buffalo was the main resource, not only for food but also for tents and clothing which were made from its skin, as well as for domestic objects made from its bones, this revolutionized their culture, enabling them to live more securely. By the 18th century they became full-fledged nomadic horse cultures and the horse became a central symbol of their lives. Aside from being appreciated because of the utility and the lifestyle it made possible, the horse also became a symbol of social prestige and a cultural object, referenced in stories and songs from the time.
