Answer:
Because they need to process more glucose and produce for ATP
Explanation:
An example is your fat cells because they store lots of energy
Answer:
The scientist done wrong by inactivating chlorophyll A and PS I.
Explanation:
The scientist done wrong by inactivate chlorophyll A and PS I. If he wants to study electron transport chain in photosynthesis, he needs chlorophyll A and PS I for that because the central role of chlorophyll A is to donate electron in the electron transport chain while on the other hand, the primary function of the photosystem I is the NADPH synthesis, where it receives the electrons for PS II.
Looks like the question is asking how evolution of a specific species affects humans negatively.
<span>Think of co-evolution examples such as predator-prey and host-parasite relationships.
</span>One example that comes to mind is <span>the use of pesticides in agriculture. It has driven the evolution of resistant insects, requiring the use of harsher chemicals in greater quantity to kill them. This can have a harmful effect on agriculture and in turn affect humans negatively. Does that makes sense?</span>
The bottom right corner of the F2 generation
since the white seed coat is recessive, there needs to be 2 of the recessive alleles for the offspring to have the white seed coat
the offspring gg is the only one that has 2 recessive alleles.
Yes they are tecnecly considered a bear they are mostly found in Asian countries and I would like to say adorable but yes they are bears along with black bears and polor bears.
