Answer:
sunk cost.
Explanation:
Sunk cost can be defined as a cost or an amount of money that has been spent on something in the past and as such cannot be recovered. Thus, because a sunk cost has been incurred by an individual or organization it can't be recovered and as such it is irrelevant in the decision-making process such as investments, projects etc.
Basically, sunk costs are referred to as fixed costs.
Sunk costs are the opposite of relevant costs because they can't be changed or recovered, as they've been spent or contracted in the past already. Hence, relevant cost are relevant for decision-making purposes but not sunk costs.
Hence, a cost incurred in the past that is not relevant to any current decision is classified as a sunk cost.
For example, ABC investors decide to acquire land and develop residential houses at a location X. This decision is informed on the fact that the government had recently enacted a policy that led to an increase in demand for residential properties in that location. 6 months into construction of the residential houses, the government reviews and rescinds the policy. This leads to a sharp decline in property values in location X. ABC investors had already incurred 10 million dollars in the project. The 10 million dollars is considered sunk cost.
Answer:
i don't thing i understand the question.
Explanation:
From the described case in the question, it is clear that Frank believes in doctrine called at-will employment or employment at-will.
At-will employment is a <u>U.S term used for a condition where an employee can be fired at anytime and without any warning as long as the reason isn’t illegal by law</u>.
This type of doctrine is no longer the main doctrine used in most U.S states by the 20th century, but it was commonplace during the late 19th century.
The kings name is King Stefan
Answer:
- What is the maximum amount you should pay to purchase a share of Angelina's stock.
$36,00
Explanation:
The dividend discount model state that the price of a stock should be the result of the Present Value of all of its future dividends, the Gordon growth model indicates that:
Price per Share = D / (r - g) = $2,16 / (0,10-0,04) = $36
Where:
D = the estimated value of next year's dividend
r = The required rate of return
g = the constant growth rate
To this case the value is: $2,16 / (0,10-0,04) = $36
