Answer:
A Subjective performance evaluation is more feasible when evaluating jobs that cannot easily be evaluated by numbers, in finding problems such as ethical errors that objective evaluation cannot identify and in identifying the rate of achievement of work goals that cannot be recorded in an objective evaluation.
Explanation:
Though Objective evaluation has been the more favored form of evaluation for valid reasons, there are still situations where subjective performance evaluation does a better job in the workplace.
Some jobs for example, the job of an attorney, cannot easily be objectively evaluated. In this situation, it falls on the employer to evaluate the performance of the employee by using measurements like team play, professionalism and client service.
In objective analysis, some ethical approaches are overlooked and the achievement of the set goal is the major criterion for ratings. This affords employees the opportunity to use unethical means to achieve set targets and the objective performance evaluation skips it, leaving them safe and with high ratings. In subjective performance ratings however, the employer having the power to rate employers, could expose these unethical behaviors faster and actions, taken on them.
In the workplace, certain goals are set in overall goals, as a method to achieving the overall set target. In an objective performance rating, an employee could bypass these and still appear to have achieved the overall goal. An objective evaluation will miss this but a subjective evaluation could pick this out and make rating each employee based on these soft goals and overall goal achievable.
Answer:
at low levels of output, AFC will be high, while at high levels of output, MC will be high as the result of diminishing returns.
Explanation:
In Economics, the law of diminishing marginal utility states that as the unit of a good or service consumed by an individual increases, the additional satisfaction he or she derives from consuming additional units would start decreasing or diminishing as the units of good or service consumed increases.
The short-run average total cost (ATC) curve of a firm will tend to be U-shaped because at low levels of output, average fixed cost (AFC) will be high, while at high levels of output, marginal cost (MC) will be high as the result of diminishing returns.
This ultimately implies that, the average fixed cost (AFC) will be high at small (low-level) output rates while marginal cost (MC) will be high at large (high-level) output rates due to diminishing marginal returns.
As a result of the law of diminishing marginal returns, a business firm would experience some rising per unit costs in the short-run.
In conclusion, an increase in the level of output for a business firm will eventually lead to an increase in average total cost (ATC) and marginal cost (MC) due to the law of diminishing marginal returns.
True. Because they have access to the defense.
Answer:
cooperative advertising
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that Sylvania was using cooperative advertising to promote its products. This refers to when a retailer/wholesaler and a manufacturer share the costs for locally placed advertisements. Such as Sylvania is doing by paying 50% of the advertisement, mainly because it also benefits them to place their sample advertisements as well.
Answer:
The answer is: D) frame
Explanation:
A human sampling frame is a list of individuals that you can draw a sample from.
For example, the firefighters bought the list of donors for finding potential donors for their cause. This list of donors would be considered the sampling frame and the donors that actually donate to them would be the sample.
