Answer: Unalienable rights
An added note of explanation:
You'll see both "unalienable" and "inalienable" used in description of these sorts of rights that cannot be taken away because they are not granted by man but are ever human being's natural possession. In the final version of the <em>Declaration of Independence, </em>the spelling <em>unalienable </em>was used. That was the copy of the document as transcribed by John Adams, which was used for printed copies to be made. Thomas Jefferson's original draft used the spelling <em>inalienable</em>. The two variations of the word were both in use at the time in the 18th century. Either way, the word means something that cannot be made alien to you -- in other words, something that is naturally your possession and cannot be taken away from you.
Answer:
The two main categories of Foreign policy enforcement are <u>Hard and Soft policies.</u>
Explanation:
Hard Policies: As the name suggests are the tools a government uses to pressurize another government as part of a particular foreign policy. This can include such things as increasing tariffs on goods, imposing sanctions, or even using forced intervention policies.
An example of a hard policy are the current sanctions against Iran.
Soft Policies: Soft policies are the complete opposite and refer to soft tools a government can use to influence foreign policy and work with other countries. This can come in the form of sending aid, grants, providing easy loans, lowering tariffs and providing incentives.
An example of a Soft policy was the trade deal NAFTA, which gave Canada, Mexico and the US, access to each other's markets.
Working for the election of sympathetic public officials
