I will say all of the above.A. B. C. and D. If that is a choice. If not I am not sure. Sorry
Answer:
"We like to think that we are unique and special, we have a set of experiences which are exclusive to us. Yet we are very predictable. Even when we are irrational, we are predictably irrational. Irrespective of our experiences and unique histories our brains respond to triggers in a predictable way."
Explanation:
Hope it helps brainiest plz if it helped have a nice day :)
25% did risky driving behaviors decrease among teens who participated in the 6-month drive cam trial.
purpose of driving. Driving serves many purposes. Basically, driving a car is a reliable, efficient, and economical means of transportation.
In legal terms, driving usually refers to a person who drives a vehicle that moves from one place to another. Traveling often means riding in a vehicle as a passenger rather than as a driver.
Traffic accidents would be greatly reduced if drivers were well trained. Knowing driving skills is important for keeping the roads safe for everyone. At the same time, it also serves as a major breakthrough in many incarnations. Learning to drive well is a difficult task, but a very important one.
Learn more about driving here: brainly.com/question/1071840
#SPJ4
I think it is D. the middle kingdom.
The question asks, "What is YOUR philosophy?" I can't really tell you what YOU should think ... but I can present for you the ideas of a couple different political philosophers who took opposing stands on the issue.
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were both English philosophers who wrote during the 17th century.
Hobbes published a famous work called <em>Leviathan </em>in 1651. The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast. Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society. In Hobbes view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast). The people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests. So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen. That was Hobbes' view.
John Locke famously published <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690. According to Locke's view, a government's power to govern comes from the consent of the people themselves -- those who are to be governed. This was a change from the previous ideas of "divine right monarchy" -- that a king ruled because God appointed him to be the ruler. Locke repudiated the views of divine right monarchy in his <em>First Treatise on Civil Government. </em> In his <em>Second Treatise on Civil Government, </em> Locke argued for the rights of the people to create their own governments according to their own desires and for the sake of protecting their own life, liberty, and property. Locke always favored the people remaining in charge, and asserted that the people have the power to change their government and remove government leaders if the government is not properly serving the needs and well-being of the people.
As you write your own answer to this question for your class, you will want to decide, perhaps, if you agree more with Hobbes, that security and stability are most important ... or with Locke, that the authority and liberty of the people are always paramount.
