Answer: The real GDP per person grew by 8%. Option C is the correct option
Explanation:
To calculate the real GDP per person, we have to calculate the real GDP growth rate in respect to the growth in population and deflator rate, then multiply it with the GDP growth.
GDP deflator = Nominal GDP ÷ Real GDP
The nominal GDP which includes the addition of population will grow by 4% since the population growth was 4%
GDP deflator increase by 6%
Therefore;
Real GDP = 4% ÷ 6% = 0.66667
THE REAL GDP PER PER PERSON
12% × 0.66667 = 8.00004%
Therefore the the real GDP per person is 8%, which is less than what he said.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Neither Italy or New Zealand.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage is the ability of an individual or organization to manufacture its products at a lower opportunity cost than its competitors. The scenario does not imply the individual has an absolute advantage. It actually means it sacrifices less to achieve that goal.
Thus, <em>Portugal has a lower opportunity cost than Italy in producing a bottle of wine. Portugal's opportunity cost is 1/2 while Italy's opportunity cost is 2. Neither Italy or New Zealand (or any other country not mentioned in the example) has a comparative advantage in producing wine</em>.
Answer:
c)
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this worry stems from the concern that TV networks could be charged with deception of the public by failing to disclose the details of product-placement deals. This is due to the fact that if the network does not tell the public the details of the product deals or even that they are being sponsored, then a consumer might buy the product under the impression that it is a good product when in fact, the network is up-selling it. Therefore it is a form of false advertising.
Answer: External opportunity
Explanation: External opportunities refers to the opportunities that arise from the political , legal and economical factors of the environment in which the organisation operates in. These are called external opportunities as organisation have no control over them.
In the given case, due to some policy changes of the Govt., Christopher corp. gets benefit of potential profits and increased market share in the future.
Thus, we can conclude that it is an external opportunity.
