The economy is strong if the country exports a lot: it then gets money from other countries. If a country has natural resources (think: diamonds for example!), it will be rich and have a strong economy.
The economy is weak if the country has to import stuff and spend money on it! especially if it's the necessary things: the country has no choice but to import food if they can't produce it, for this reason for example the food items in the north of Canada are every expensive.
Generally, exporting is good for economy and importing bad for it.
Benefits:
Easy to find work, many people are willing to hire others for cheap, and can be a really good starting spot or a job that you take on in college or high school to get a little bit of spending money.
Drawbacks:
Not good for long-term work, minimum benefits like health-insurance and other insurance, often won't provide enough to support a family and sometimes yourself, can be hard to save up for more expensive things like an education or a house.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The answer is dispositional and situational, respectively.
Explanation:
A dispositional attribution judgement holds a person's internal traits as responsible for an outcome. In the example, you think the skier fell due to his lack of skills.
On the other hand, a situational attribution holds the conditions of the environment or the situation as responsible for the outcome.
Studies show that <u>situational attribution is more common when judging our own outcomes</u>, especially when negative.
The correct answer is: "receiving money for the remission of sins".
The Catholic Church used to sell indulgences. Extremely poor people spent all the money they could have saved to buy these products, because they were told in church (and therefore they believed so) that they would be forggiven for their sins and heaven would await for them after the purchase.
Martin Luther criticized the existence of this lucrative activity connected to the power of removing sins, which according to his beliefs was only held by Gold. Therefore, the members of the clergy were deceiving their congregations just to earn money for themselves.
the answer is: The neutral stimulus causes no response.
Without being paired by any situation, neutral stimulus would not mean anything to the subjects. Because of this , the subjects would normally just ignore the neutral stimulus every time they face it.
But, when the neutral stimulus is paired with a certain situation (such as ringing a bell before giving foods to dogs), the dogs will associate the neutral stimulus with the positive reinforcement. To the point where the neutral stimulus transformed into a conditioned stimulus, which make the dogs'mouth to start watering every time they hear the bell.
