Answer:
a. Production decreased by 4 percent
Explanation:
In 2009, production: 60,000 units
Hours worked per day: 80x8= 640 hours
Productivity= 60,000/640 hours =93.75 units per day
In 2010: production: 76 500 units
Hours worked per day= 85x10= 850 hours
productivity= 76,500/850= 90 units per day
In 2010, production decreased by 3.75 per day. (93.75-90.00)
percentage decrease= (3.75/93.75) x 100=4
In 2010 production decreased by 4 percent
Evidence of one's claim to authority or competence, such as a diploma, degree, certification, or license is known as the credential.
<h3>What is the evidence?</h3>
Evidence is the term that means to show or to prove that a particular thing is true or is in existence. For better understanding, a few illustrations can be taken. Like They found evidence of a robbery, in the room footprints of three persons present, and many more.
In any courtroom for making the case strong, one has to present evidence that is real like fingerprints, blood samples, DNA, a knife, a gun, and other physical objects.
There are basically two types of evidence, which include Oral and Documentary evidence. Documents that include electronic records are documentary evidence.
Thus, all the names given in the statement are of documentary evidence or credential.
Learn more about evidence from here:
brainly.com/question/6764645
#SPJ1
Answer:
i think its help stay happy
Answer:
The equilibrium expected rate of return is higher for Kaskin than for Quinn.
Explanation:
Option A “The equilibrium expected rate of return is higher for Kaskin than for Quinn” is more accurate because the expected return is calculated by multiplying the risk premium with beta value and then adding with risk-free return. However, if the beta value is high, then the magnitude after multiplying with the risk premium will be high. Moreover, is magnitude will be added to risk-free return to find the expected return. Thus, it can be seen that Kaskin has high beta 1.2 as compared to Quinn’s beta value 0.6. So, the Kaskin has a higher expected return.
Answer:
$1,700,000
Explanation:
The computation of the NET accounts receivable (the cash realizable value) at December 31, 2019 is shown below:
= Account receivable - allowance for doubtful debts
= $2,000,000 - $300,000
= $1,700,000
By deducting the allowance for doubtful debts from the account receivable we can get the net account receivable or the cash realizable value
Therefore we ignored the bad debt expense
