Answer:
C). To become real property, their mobile home must have a permanent foundation.
Explanation:
A general property or possessions are considered to be real property when it is permanently attached to land or real estate property.
As per the question, option C displays a true claim as it correctly describes that 'to become real property, the mobile phones of them must have a permanent foundation.' Thus, the above statement correctly states that in order to make the mobile phones or any other property similar to it as real property, it is required to be attached to permanent property like 'land, building, etc. Therefore, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.
The reformers reconciled their desire to create moral order
with their quest to enhance personal freedom. This they did by stressing liberation
from external restraints, like slavery, and internal servitude, such as
drinking alcohol. <span>According to them, a lot of people were "slaves" to
various sins and liberating them from this enslavement would enable them to
compete economically.</span>
The Articles of confederation was considered to be weak and ineffectual so, Constitutional convention decided to transform it.
Federalists, who were strong supporters of the constitution deliberated that incorporation of Bill of rights would stand to be a barrier which would give a vague representation of the constitution. However after great deliberations they conceded to incorporate Bill of rights which were a series of amendments and this decision was to appease the anti-federalists who recommended the inclusion of Bill of rights. Federalists supported for the strong federal Government which has the power to raise an army, impose taxes and execute laws.
Anti-federalists fought for strong state governments as they were apprehended that the constitution may carry an element of despotism which was during the British rule and hence asked for representation of states.
Finally, the founding fathers concluded that each small state has a vote and they can form the senate and big states were given two votes and they were eligible to form the lower house. Thus the final outline of the Constitution was formed.
<span>A dispute over the terms of a contract is an example of a civil case, at least it sounds like one because two civil parties usually sign contracts.</span>
Hello. Your question is incomplete and this makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, in the context of your question, we can assume that you are referring to John Marshall's decision regarding the Marbury v. Madison. If that is the case, I hope the answer below can help you.
Answer and Explanation:
In the case of Marbury v. Madison, John Marshall decided that the national congress does not have absolute power over government decisions, as, like the entire political body in the country, it was subject to the laws covered by the federal constitution. Thus, any act, adopted by Congress, or any other branch of government, that was unconstitutional, that is, that was not approved by any law within the federal constitution, could be revised or completely annulled by the Supreme Court.
What prompted Marshall to decide this was the positioning of the federal constitution as the country's supreme law, which cannot be violated in any way.
The Marbury case v. Madison, occurred when William Marbury, who was appointed as country judge by President John Adams, did not receive the diploma that allowed him to hold office, when James Madison became Secretary of State after President Thomas Jefferson came to power. However, as an appointed judge, Marbury had the right to receive the diploma and Marshall saw the denial of the diploma as an unconstitutional act.