<span>Let the height of the tree be h foot.
Trigonometric ratio for tangent = Opposite side / adjacent side----(1)
Since the tree is standing vertically on a level ground, the three points, [ Top of the tree, the point where the tree touches the ground and the point where the shadow ends] form a right angled triangle.
Applying (1) for the above three points, tan(24.7)=(height of the tree)/(length of shadow)
Hence, height of the tree = tan(24.7)*(length of the shadow)
= (0.46)*140
= 65 foot (Rounding off to the nearest foot)</span>
I believe it is the bookshelf one
Answer:
- not linear
- somewhere between 184 and 186 (maybe)
Step-by-step explanation:
As you show, the weight differences are different for the same week differences, so the table is not linear. A graph (attached) can also show you the table is not linear.
__
The highest rate of weight loss shown in the table is 7 lbs in 3 weeks, or 4 2/3 pounds in 2 weeks. The lowest rate of weight loss shown in the table is 5 lbs in 3 weeks, or 3 1/3 pounds in 2 weeks. Based on the rates shown in the table, we might expect the starting weight to be between 3 1/3 and 4 2/3 pounds more than the first table value:
Week 0 weight: between 184 1/3 and 185 2/3 lbs, estimated.
_____
A "line of best fit" for the data has a y-intercept of about 185 pounds, which is the midpoint between our two estimates above.
Answer:
c
Step-by-step explanation:
just took the test
Answer:
120 000 m^2
Step-by-step explanation:
I ASSUME you're being asked to convert from km^2 to m^2.
For this you need to identify the conversion rate, which is 1 000 000 m^2 / 1 km ^2. Multiply by the thing you're converting from and cancel the units.
(1 000 000 m^2 / 1 km ^2) x 0,12 km^2 = 120 000 m^2 (the km^2 cancels out, leaving you only with your target unit of m^2)
