What was the result of the Supreme Court Case- Brown vs Board of Education?

History

2 answers:

Lemur [1.5K]3 years ago

6 0

They ruled that separating children in public schools by race was unconstitutional.

dangina [55]3 years ago

3 0

In this milestone decision, the Supreme Court ruled that separating children in public schools on the basis of race was unconstitutional. It signaled the end of legalized racial segregation in the schools of the United States, overruling the "separate but equal" principle set forth in the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson case.

You might be interested in

After the segregation of the major leagues, African American players

Tpy6a [65]

After the segregation of the major leagues, African American players played in Negro leagues.

<h3>What do you mean by segregation?</h3>

The action or state of setting someone apart from others.

After the segregation of the major leagues, African American players played in Negro Leagues. Baseball was a segregated sport as American and National leagues were formed by major league baseball unofficially that banned African Americans.

Learn more about segregation here:

brainly.com/question/2933804?referrer=searchResults

7 0

2 years ago

What do you call the Judicial Branch at the Local Level?

Ilya [14]

Answer:

What is the local judicial branch called?

A municipal court exercises judicial functions, although in a more limited way than the state or federal courts, and the mayor (or manager) heads the executive branch of city government much like the president and governor head the federal and state executive branches, respectively.

Hope this helps and have a nice day!

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

musickatia [10]

C education pls give brainyfart

8 0

3 years ago

18 pts PLEASE ANSWER <br>how did nativism contribute to immigration restrictions?

tangare [24]

Nativism and Immigration Restriction. Anti-immigrant sentiment had been prevalent in the United States since at least the 1840s. It had many sources. Nativists played on fears of violence and of the diversity of thought, belief, and custom represented by European radicalism and religion.

Hope This Helps!

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In the Declaration of Independence, the list of complaints against the king of England is described as a list of "facts." Accord

BigorU [14]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

I think the authors of the declaration partially succeeded in providing a perfectly unbiased account of the king's actions. However, when reading the text of the Declaration, you can notice some biased when using adjectives and sentences that describe the King of England's offenses to the American colonies.

For example, I want to share the following evidence from the text. The following excerpt of the Declaration: <em>"...But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."</em>

When you read it, you can notice the kinds of words Thomas Jefferson used to disqualify the decisions of the British government. Words lie "abuses," "usurpations," and "despotism," are strong words that were chosen by the framers of the Declaration to appeal to the emotions of the colonists.

8 0

3 years ago