Answer:
i think but not sure it is the 3rd one
Explanation:
It was to shorten travel and trade distance.
<span>Herodotus and Thucydides take two different approaches in recording history. They are both considered fathers of their respective branches of historiography. Herodotus, although he has some interest in the facts, is mostly writing to entertain his audiences. He writes a history of the Persian Wars, but spends most of his time writing about the histories of different places involved in the story. He sensationalizes stories to make them more interesting, and changes facts in order to show a moral or lesson, and sometimes completely makes things up (like giant gold digging ants, ect.) Its unsure to what extent he consciously made these things up, or if he believed them and had just heard them from unreliable sources. There is truth to his writing, but one must consciously glean what is true from what is false, and go into his work knowing that you can't trust everything he says. </span>
The most likely answer would be b hunting deer for sport because before the neolithic revolution hunting and gathering were the only way they could get food since they had not yet discovered agriculture. living in a large urban center would be very silly because the concept of large cities wasn't around.
Answer: The slave trade had weakened many African kingdoms.
Explanation:
Although the Spanish and Portuguese had already been enslaving African eople since the 1500s, the Atlantic slave trade of the 18th century was different and to a bigger scale. The huge demand for slaves pushed leaders into constant conflict with locals, which diverted them from trade and undermined their defenses. Eventually, the weakening of the African kingdoms would lead to further colonization by Europeans throughout the 1800s.
