Okay, think of an essay or paragraph as like stating your opinion. Here’s how to break it down so it’s a little easier:
Paragraph 1 - Introduction.
Provide background information on the topic. Give about 1-2 sentences on what the topic is about, and for the 3rd sentence, put in a statement that IS your argument.
For example, “French fries are the best food ever because they are delicious.”
Paragraph 2 - Conflict.
Elaborate on your argument/thesis statement. Since that seems to be your conflict, describe something hard you’ve been through. What was hard about it? How did it affect you?
Paragraph 3 - Response
Elaborate more on how the conflict affected you personally. If you can, try to connect it to a bigger picture or theme.
For example, “I broke my leg in middle school as a result of a basketball injury. Therefore, we should eliminate school sports because they cause injuries.”
It’s a reach, but that’s the entire point of connecting to a bigger theme.
Paragraph 4 - Explain Response
Here is where you’re going to connect your response in paragraph 3 to a bigger picture. Talk about the outcome and effect you showed in paragraph 3.
The questions mentioned should help you- break it down in a way that you understand. I tried to simplify this for you in the easiest way possible, I hope it helps and good luck :)
Answer:
The role of feudal lords in European feudalism.
Explanation:
According to the given source document, it is explained how the daimyos(lords) of Japan would play their roles in the feudal system and in obeisance to the shogun (grand Lord) and what they are expected to do and avoid.
According to the document, it is advised that warriors who have been accused of rebellion or murder should be dismissed at once and that bigger daimyos should not move about with more than 20 mounted warriors and lesser daimyos should cut down their forces proportionately.
Based on the details of this Document 1, it is most similar to the role of feudal lords in European feudalism.
Answer: The answer is: f(x) = 2x^2 + 40x + 200
Explanation:
Given: x is the width of the Artwork
Let W be the Width of the Frame
Let L be the Length of the Frame
Width = x + 10
Length = Width * 2, so by substitution, Length = 2(x + 10)
Area = Width * Length
By substitution:
Area = (x + 10) * 2(x + 10)
f(x) = (x + 10) * (2x + 20)
f(x) = 2x^2 + 20x + 20x + 200
f(x) = 2x^2 + 40x + 200
To test this, if a picture 8" wide is put in this frame, the width would be 8+10 or 18 inches. The length would be twice the width, or 36 inches. The Area is 18 x 36 = 648.
Using the formula:
f(8) = (2 * 8^2) + (40 * 8) + 200
f(8) = (2 * 64) + 320 + 200
f(8) = 128 + 320 + 200
f(8) = 648
Hi Thaddeush13,
Biases - " lacking a neutral viewpoint, or not having an open mind".
The potential biases that could hapen in this experiment are different intakes or types of coffee. For Example, Cold, Hot, Caramel. And each as a different size. Sugar intake is also another problem here.
