The best answer for this question would be:
his portrayal of gender roles
The feminist perspective in the novel is based on how the patriarchy is treated in the story. Some parts of the story has devalued women’s feelings or the community of women in general in some moments.
Answer:
It also touches on the theme of being an outsider, which is very much explored in the anchor text. The author recounts his early childhood experiences of attending an American school, and reflects upon how he experienced shame of his Korean background.
Because it tells about an important time in history and gives us information about how some of the Jews had to live in this time.
I think A is the answer, just because if I was a company, that is something that would sound professional and nice. :D Hope I helped
Answer:
Thirteen! Why you're correct - thirteen! We can never plunk down with thirteen. That is all because of Mr. Harper's carelessness. Wiped out companion, nothing! He's only one of those thoughtless men who never answer their solicitations in time."
Refer below for the explanation.
Explanation:
As a high-class singular, associations among eminence and the rich are central with regards to keeping up or improving your economic wellbeing inside the more elite class of society.
One of the most widely recognized issues such individuals face while attempting to fabricate and improve the bonds with different individuals from high society emerges with regards to extravagant and costly supper courses of action. Thusly, every fork and blade must be perfect, each plate sparkly spotless and everybody must be situated as needs be.
Mrs. Horace Pringle's supper table fits absolutely fourteen individuals, setting a seat at each end and lines of six seats on each side. On the off chance that those fourteen seats are not appropriately filled, there will be a shock and even the sovereignty they are attempting to dazzle may know about such a humiliating circumstance.