Answer:His absence from the game placed his team in jeopardy.
Explanation:
A few years ago I had an English teacher that encouraged "The Oreo Method"; it compares effective constructive criticism to an Oreo cookie.
The filling in the middle was the constructive criticism, but before and after that, you offer positive feedback for the writer.
Pretty self explanatory:
1. Provide one piece of positive feedback first and linger on it for a couple sentences; let them know how important that "thing" is and, in a way, praise them for doing it. This primes them to accept your feedback cause they know how thoroughly you've read and analyzed their work.
2. Offer any and all of the constructive criticism you have; stay subtle and be concise with all your feedback.
3. Offer more positive feedback, as many good things as you can come up with.
By submerging the constructive criticism between positive feedback, you keep their hopes up while still thoroughly conveying weak spots in their work.
I hope this kinda made sense; it's a very self explanatory idea so I had trouble elaborating on it.
I say true since it says they "have a better chance at being successful" instead of a definite chance.
Now we are engaged in a great civil war teasting answer C
Answer: A. The Germans often sent important messages concerning their war efforts to their ambassador in Washington, D.C.
Explanation: Readers who make inferences use the clues in the text along with their own experiences to help them figure out what is not directly said. Inference also involves using what you know to make a guess about what you know or reading between the lines.
