The only internal one I ever learned was character versus self.
The others are external:
Character versus fate
Character versus nature
Character versus character
Character versus society
Answer:
I think so
Explanation:
It depends on the type of situation though Like for example, Some Antagonists can become Antiheroes, Which are Protagonists for their own gains, and then can become Antagonist all over again. Sometimes, the Antagonist has a change of heart because of something, and Becomes a Protagonist all on its own. Sometimes, Antagonist just stay Antagonists
If a writer is structuring an argument towards an audience that has an interest in a specific cause, the writer will use specific vocabulary, details, stories, and facts that appeal to that cause. Pathos (the use of emotional appeal in an argument) is a strong benefit to add to an argument, and the writer might take a specific story of someone who has been affected by the cause in order to make the audience emotional. If they become emotionally invested in the argument it is more likely to be effective. Additionally, specific vocabulary (including abbreviations) and relevant facts (logos) will help the audience understand and appreciate the argument. Finally, the author should establish their credibility (ethos) as an expert on the subject so that the audience trusts what they are saying.
I’m not sure about 2 and 3 but number 1 is
two stanzas, each 4 lines
that fourth of july should not be celebrated by black because we (blacks) did not gain independence from slavery
