Answer: Please refer to Explanation
Explanation:
(a) A rise in the average price of inputs
DECREASE because it is now less profitable for suppliers so they will produce less.
(b) An increase in worker productivity;
INCREASE because total cost is reduced as more goods are being produced per cost.
(c) Government antipollution regulations become stricter.
DECREASE (unless the increase in antipollution device production outweighs the decline in production caused by the increased cost of the regulations)
(d) A new subsidy program is enacted for new business investment in productive equipment.
INCREASE as the subsidy program will lower the cost of inputs so Suppliers will produce more goods.
(e) Energy prices decline.
INCREASE as there again would be Lower Input Costs thus pushing Suppliers to produce more.
True, any institutional ads are intended to promote a company or something.
Yes the large drug companies guilty of price gouging or of charging an unfair or exploitative price for their products and no <span>americans shouldnt be permitted to import drugs from canada or other countries</span>
Answer:
Option A Net income will be the same under both variable and absorption costing.
Explanation:
The condition here given is:
Production Units = Sales units
Now under such conditions their is no finished goods and all the fixed costs are absorbed in the units produced in the absorption costing which means all the fixed production costs are part of the cost of goods sold.
In variable costing system, the fixed costs are not absorbed in the units and deducted as period cost.
So this means no cost is left which is not deducted from the revenue and this gives us net income that is same amount when we either use variable costing or use absorption costing. But remember that this is only possible when the production units are equal to sales units.
No it never has. I just focus a lot and try not to look if my classroom is decorated.
