Answer: quid pro quo sexual harassment
Explanation:
The scenario represented in the question regarding Rhonda and her company's chief financial officer is referred to as quid pro quo sexual harassment.
Quid pro quo sexual harassment is a situation that occurs when benefits, pay, employment, position, training, title, position are based on the condition that the other individual involved agree to ones sexual advances. It should be noted that this is illegal.
It's called an upselling
It's a common technique that a salesman/ marketing team use to increase profit with promise that the customer will get a better product or service
The example of an upselling is when you want to buy a cheap house, but the salesman manage to convinced you that buying another expensive house is good for your investment, and you buy the expensive one instead.
Answer:
d. With trade, Brazil should specialize in sugar cane and China in iPods.
Explanation:
As from the given situation it can be seen that Brazil has an absolute advantage while producing the sugarcane as it takes one unit of labor for generating one unit of sugarcane
On the other hand, china has an absolute advantage for generating an ipod as it takes four unit of labor to generate one ipod
Therefore the option d is correct
Answer:
($39,700)
Explanation:
Cash outflows:
($40,000) exchanged for common stock.
($1,200) used to pay salaries.
Cash inflows:
$1,500 received from a sale
So we have a negative 41,200 representing cash outflows, and only $1,500 in cash inflows (we are not told if the $200 billed were already received so I will leave them out). Making a simple arithmetic operation, we obtain the answer:
Cash balance = -$41,200 + $1,500
= -$39,700
Answer: True
Explanation:
The Lucas critique points out that expectation has effects on how policy affects inflation and output which makes creating beneficial policy difficult.
