<em>Would a prediction be accurate if the person about to act becomes aware of the prediction prior to the act itself? </em>
This is a classic problem of the deterministic approach to action. If psychology was perfect, it is likely that this would enable psychologists to predict how a person is going to act in any situation. It would also make psychologists able to predict when this act would take place. However, for such a prediction to be useful, the psychologist would have to keep this information from the subject. Otherwise, the knowledge of the prediction could potentially make the person act in a different way, rendering the prediction obsolete.
<em>Does the fact that a prediction can be known in advance disprove the possibility of predicting accurately or is that fact just one more antecedent condition? </em>
The fact that a prediction can be known in advance does disprove the possibility of predicting accurately. The moment a prediction is made, the prediction alters the state of the components that were necessary to know in order to make a prediction. Therefore, the prediction becomes obsolete as the action might or might not happen in the way that was previously predicted.
The best situation for the example in our daily lives would be that every purchase you make at a chain store is sale that a local small business misses out on.
Zero- sum is a circumstance in game hypothesis in which one individual's gain is identical to another's misfortune. A zero- sum game in this instance speaks to the accompanying circumstance: if the amount of sales increments for a chain store, at that point the measure of sales will similarly diminish in a little store
Answer:
to show the location of major sections of a text
Explanation:
Answer:
B- Ghetto
Explanation:
A part of a city, especially a slum area, occupied by a minority group or groups.
