Answer:
D.) Franklin Delano Roosevelt
I hope I helped! ^-^
The United States was divided by the liberal policies of older politicians and more conservative views of young Americans.
<h3><u>
Who are liberals?</u></h3>
- Since "liberal" and "liberty" have the same root, it can refer to anything from being "generous" to "loose" to "broad-minded."
- A person who thinks that the government should actively encourage social and political transformation is referred to politically as such.
- The term "liberal" is frequently applied to political parties in a number of other nations, albeit the stances taken by these parties don't always match the definition of "liberal" that Americans typically use.
- The term has been linked to both the Democratic and Republican parties in the US, though typically in a descriptive rather than a titular meaning.
- Liberalism is a political and moral ideology founded on the rights of the person, liberty, consent of the governed and equality before the law.
Depending on how they interpret these tenets, liberals hold a wide range of opinions, but in general, they back private property, a market economy, individual liberties, liberal democracy, secularism, the rule of law, economic and political freedom, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and religion.
Know more about liberals with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/3819982
#SPJ4
Answer:
<em>Spam</em> or <em>Spam e-mail</em>
Explanation:
<em>Spam, often called junk email</em>, is an unwanted bulk of messages sent through emails.
Spam recipients have regularly have had their email addresses gotten by <em>spam-bots</em>, which are robotized programs that crawl the web in search of email addresses. Spammers send messages to <em>a number of email addresses</em>, expecting only a tiny amount to react to the message or communicate with it.
Answer:
There were not "branches" of government in the modern sense with the judiciary separated from the legislature and the executive. But Ammianus is not correct that the Senate had "all" the power either. The Senate appointed the Consuls each year (the executives, who effectively took the place of kings) and pretty much all the other officials. Senate resolutions (consults) had virtually the force of law. The Senate itself could act as a judiciary over its own members, particularly in cases of treason and such, and the officials they appointed had judicial as well as executive powers in their respective jurisdictions.
But there were also other, broader assemblies, of the army, the citizens, and the plebs (the membership of which would have overlapped a lot), and each of those had genuine powers. Formal written laws (leges) had to be voted in by the citizen assembly - they couldn't be simply decreed by the senate, and they had more weight than senate consults. Perhaps most importantly, the tribunes of the plebs had veto power over the acts of any official, which was a protection of the rights of common citizens against abuse by patricians.
The whole thing had begun with revolt against the abuses of corrupt kings. The senate had probably been a council of nobles advising the kings before that. With the kings gone, the senate took control, and the appointment of consuls was a way to have someone fill the roles kings had played like leading the army. Over the first couple of centuries of the republic, there was great civil strife between patricians (nobles in the senate) and plebeians (commoners), particularly over burdens of military service and taxation. The outcome of it was the growth of the plebeian assembly's powers and the tribunes, and the creation of a system that would admit leading plebeians as well as patricians to the senate's ranks through public service. So it all evolved in response to the demands of the time.<u>(Answer not mine)</u>
