Answer:
I found that using primary sources was one way to present students with ... Creator: Will your students be able to find out who created the primary source? How much information can they find out about the creator's beliefs or other works? Your own point of view: Consider your own beliefs about a historical
Explanation:
I got it right
Answer:
C. historical background
Explanation:
According to my research on natural disaster warning procedures, I can say that based on the information provided within the question all of the answers provided except for historical background will elicit a quick response from the public. In order for the public to react quickly to an upcoming dangerous event they need to know how bad the event will be, how likely it is to happen, and what they can do to protect themselves. Historical background will not provide any help to the public.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The answer is helplessness theory or learned helplessness. It is when people feel helpless to avoid negative situations because previous experience has shown them that they do not have control. An example is imagine that you just failed a major test. There are some things that you could say were the reason for that: 'I'm stupid.' 'I didn't study hard enough.' 'The test was too hard.'
Each of those reasons can be seen as a not the same type of attribution. An attribution is an aspect that a person blames for the consequence of a situation. The three types of attribution is global, stable, and internal. An internal attribution is any attribution that gives the root of an event as something to do with the person, as contrasting to something in the outside world. A stable attribution is one that doesn't change over time or across situations. Finally, a global attribution is the acceptance that the factors affecting the consequence relates to a large number of situations, not just one of them.
At the time, the government was considered to be democratic, the only federalist officers were the judges. In marbury v Madison the judge, was a federalist (Judge Marshall). What happened was Jefferson order the Secretary of state to not deliver commissions to federalist judges. Marybury sued for commissions, which created the case. What was significant was Marshall used the judiciary act to rule Marbury had commission, but it gave the court grater power than the constitution make the act unconstitutional. Marbury lost the case but the federalist judges won in the end. This case created Judicial review which let the supreme court exercise the power to decide weather an act of congress was allowed by the constitution. This gave the judges more power
The procedure that must be carried out when a motorboat <span>is crossing paths with a pwc is that the rules of the road should be implemented to the situation. To add up, a PWC is considered to be a much powerful boat compared to a motorboat and strict road regulations for the sake of safety.</span>
