Rather than explicitly describe a characters qualities, an author shows the character as he or she moves through the world, allowing the reader to infer the character qualities from his or her behavior!
Depending on a situation, for example if the plot is in Paris and the main character is in disparity. Their actions or their speech would tell us what’s happening
Implicit characterization is when you need to infer what a character is like. This occurs when an author gives you a characters thoughts, actions, interactions, speech, and context
A. Making the dress available only at select outlets
The awnser is be semi true means that some of it is true. The statement might be partly true. And semi means half.
I found more information on this word.
- "The statement might be partly true, the statement may be totally true but only part of the whole truth, or it may use some deceptive element, such as improper punctuation, or double meaning, especially if the intent is to deceive, evade, blame or misrepresent the truth."
- "Semi- is a numerical prefix meaning "half" The prefix alone is often used as an abbreviation when the rest of the word (the thing which half of is being described) is clear from context."
Answer:
Tinker v. Des Moines was a ruling of the Supreme Court of 1969, through which an interpretation of the right to freedom of expression enshrined in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution was made.
In the events that motivated the cause, anti-war and pacifist students from different high schools in the city of Des Moines, Iowa, began to carry black ribbons on their arms as a protest and a sign of mourning for the lives of the young Americans and Vietnamese soldiers who were dying in battle.
School district authorities punished these students with suspensions and other disciplinary sanctions, against which their families sued the district. The Court, finally, established that the fact that these children wore black bracelets was part of their right to freedom of expression, and that the Des Moines school district could not limit this right, especially when the fact that they wore said bracelets did not impede the normal development of school activities or violate the rights of other children or third parties.
