1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleks [24]
3 years ago
6

A legend is a semi-true story, which has been passed on from person-to-person and has important meaning or symbolism for the cul

ture in which it originates.
Infer what is meant by semi-true.
a.
Not true at all
c.
Completely true
b.
Some parts are true, but not all of it is true
d.
none of the above


Please select the best answer from the choices provided

A
B
C
D
English
1 answer:
PtichkaEL [24]3 years ago
3 0

The awnser is be semi true means that some of it is true.  The statement might be partly true. And semi means half.

I found more information on this word.

  •      "The statement might be partly true, the statement may be totally true but only part of the whole truth, or it may use some deceptive element, such as improper punctuation, or double meaning, especially if the intent is to deceive, evade, blame or misrepresent the truth."
  • "Semi- is a numerical prefix meaning "half" The prefix alone is often used as an abbreviation when the rest of the word (the thing which half of is being described) is clear from context."
You might be interested in
Is the pronoun in bold reflexive or intensive? Rosalie is so talented in the kitchen that she created a new recipe for buttersco
Elis [28]

Answer:

Reflexive.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
I need help <br> Writing a topic about ( where we live ) 400 to 500 words
Vinil7 [7]



When we look in the mirror, we realize how time is inexorably running out, and our lives are being consumed.
If we were to look at our city from a 10th floor building, we would see thousands of lives like ours, moving to and from, like ants or robots, mixing and shaping what we call a society.
Throughout time, generations of people like us have been born and have died.
It is unavoidable to question a few times in our fleeting life if what mankind has done is worthy of being called an evolution or an accomplishment.
Our race has evolved from a primitive organization, through the discovery of what mother nature has given us on this little planet, to a more organized form of living and interacting together, which we can call a society.
Our lives have also been transformed by the industrial revolution and technology.
The forms of organizing our societies -- which we can call politics -- have changed from absolute theocracies to the feudal system to the first forms of popular democracy. We have passed through failed experiments, such as communism, naziism and other absolutist regimes, and have also suffered wars which have cost millions of lives and caused widespread bloodshed until just a few generations ago.

Our question – is the current world really any better than it has been for centuries? -- is legitimate.

First, there is no doubt that most of the world population still lives in misery and suffers from starvation, wars and absolutist regimes, deprived of most of technology and basic needs of life, in a way not so different from how our ancestors were living (trying to survive) centuries ago.

Then has the very small part of the world -- called “first world” or “developed countries” -- really achieved a just and fair society and a cozy standard of living?
Most fanatics of technology would surely praise our “gadgets” which seem to make our lives so much better. But I am afraid this is nothing more than an illusion.
Were our grandparents’ lives so much worse just because they had no color TVs, no cell phones, no computer games?

What will our descendants in 200 years say about us?
That our lives were terrible because our cars could not fly, our computers had no protobio-chips and so could not think like humans, our planes could not fly around the planet in 30 minutes?

I don ‘t think so; we cannot desire, or aspire for, what doesn’t exist (yet).

So thinking that we have a meaningful and easy life thanks to the technology and industry revolution is pointless.
The real grain of the question is: Are our lives really better? Are we really happy?
Are we really free and fairly organized by the representatives of our society (politicians)?
Well, from what I can see with my eyes and hear with my ears, I would say the answer is “Not quite.”
Most of the world is in disarray, and people are languishing and suffering as they did in the worst periods of the Middle Age.
The other part of the world sees most of the population (the so called middle class) working like beasts of burden all their lives to receive – if they are lucky -- a miserable pension which will be not enough to help deal with the ailments of old age.
Almost everywhere, including in the most stable democracies of the first world, people are totally discouraged about politics, and don‘t believe the system is fair.
So, what it is the point then, if democracy was supposed to have meant “power of the masses”?
We, ourselves, are supposed to be in charge, through a select group of representatives we elect.
This is what democracy is supposed to be. But this concept is so far from reality, even in the perceptions of the people in the most consolidated political democracies, that we really need to question what is wrong with our society
6 0
2 years ago
Viewing other people’s photography can be both a learning experience and enjoyable. How should people behave when they visit a p
Doss [256]

They should be respectful by not tuching the art.

They should be mindful of others by not being too loud.

And they should be polite... If you have nothing nice to say dont say anything at all.

5 0
3 years ago
Which of these sentences from the passage most directly expresses the author's claim?
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:d

Explanation: sheilding our children from these (mistakes) by striving for perfection in our own parenting does them no favors

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
4. Define whackadoodle
kherson [118]

Answer:

Wackadoodle describes someone or something as eccentric, wrongheaded, bizarre, or foolish, generally in an amusing way and with a mildly dismissive tone.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Select the correct text in the passage.
    12·2 answers
  • Which two inner planets have water in the form of ice?
    10·1 answer
  • In novels, falling action is often followed by
    8·2 answers
  • The phrase "frozenhearted Northland Wild" means that​
    9·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP I GIVE BRAINLIEST
    12·1 answer
  • What is the meaning of love how is it show write a five-sentence paragraph
    13·2 answers
  • 1) Which is the best description of the relationship established between
    10·2 answers
  • Read the paragraph.
    15·2 answers
  • 18. Olu is not ....... as his sister.
    11·2 answers
  • The committee of politicians has the power to enforce their policies without exception.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!