Y = 1/3x + 2. That is your line.
=ligma baalls so that I can tape this d to your fore head so you can cd’s nuts
No. Aaron ate more because 5/6 is a larger fraction than 2/3.
Answer: D.) This is an example of inductive reasoning because a general conclusion is reached based on a specific example,
Step-by-step explanation: Inductive reasoning simply refers to making conclusion about a specific subject or topic from patterns or insights derived from related examples. In the scenario above, the conclusion reached encompasses the overall full time 4 years college student. However, this conclusion was inferred based on a specific example comprising of only a randomized sample of 1200 full time 4 years college students in 100 campuses. random. The example failed to incorporate every student, Hence, the conclusion is induced as the choice of a sample of students may not convey the choice or decision of all.
Deductive reasoning meanwhile follows that a generally established fact is used to make conclusion about a specific example.
There is a 60% chance that the product of the two numbers will be 7 because the numbers 1-6 are each 10% of the 100%.
