I believe the answer is: A social movement.
A social movement refers to a form of organized effort that aimed to address a specific social or political issues.
In general, these movement usually an effort to alleviate the suffering from a suppressed group that receive unfair treatment from the majorities.
The correct answer is letter B
The informant is under no obligation to speak the truth, and the person is allowed to lie in his testimony.
Thus, the first difference is that the witness has an obligation to speak the truth. The informant does not have this duty.
The second difference is observed at the time of the judge to analyze the evidence obtained during the process.
Health Care is the answer for apex
<span>In the Elstad case the court ruled that
the suspect’s statement that put him in the act, or admitted guilt was unsolicited. He was taken to the station and Maranda
before he gave a second statement.
During the questioning of Seibert, five days after the act, the officer
questioned her for 30 to 40 minutes obtaining a confession that caused a death
in the fire of her trailer. After taking
a 20 minute break the officer came back, read the Maranda and obtained a signed
waiver. Then got another statement. The
District Court suppressed the prewarning statement but admitted the post
warning one, and Seibert was convicted of second-degree murder. The Missouri
Court of Appeals affirmed, finding the case indistinguishable from Oregon
v. Elstad,
in which this Court held that a suspect's
unwarned inculpatory statement made during a brief exchange at his house did
not make a later, fully warned inculpatory statement inadmissible. In
reversing, the State Supreme Court held that, because the interrogation was
nearly continuous, the second statement, which was clearly the product of the
invalid first statement, should be suppressed; and distinguished Elstad
on the ground that the warnings had not intentionally been withheld</span>
This was in the 1949s, right after the Great Depression when FDR was president.
