Answer: It is relevant and sufficient, because she gives convincing examples of how phones support classwork.
Explanation:
Parvati's argument in favor of using cell phones in class is valid and sufficient. The evidence she presents is strong - she claims that cell phones are useful research tools that enable us to find the right piece of information. She also provides specific examples and even explains a situation in her class where cell phones were used. This makes her argument convincing, because she supports her claim with solid evidence.
Answer:
D). Rule; Issue; Analysis.
Explanation:
The three correct words to complete the given statement and accomplish its meaning appropriately. The final statement reads as:
"From this analysis, a <u>rule</u> can be made as to whether or not the <u>issue</u> applies to the <u>analysis</u>."
<u>As per the IRAC(Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion) method, the given laws are applied to the facts associated with the issue in order to analyse if it is applicable to the issue for bringing a resolution by reaching a conclusion</u>. Thus, the rule can be developed that if the issue justifies the analysis or application. Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
