Answer: 9.7%
Explanation:
Given Data
Rf = Risk free return = 6%,
Rpm = Risk premium = 4%,
Beta = 0.9
Wd = Debt = 20%
rd = cost of debt = 8%
We = equity = 80%
Re = Rf + Beta (Rpm)
= 0.06 +0.9 (0.04)
= 0.096 * 100
= 9.6%
Unlevered Equity Cost ;
ReU= Wd × rd + We × re
= 0.20 × 8% + 0.80 × 9.6%
= 9.28%
Levered Equity Cost:
New Debt = 60%,
New Equity = 40%,
New rd = 9%
ReL = ReU + (ReU - rd) (D ÷ E)
= 9.28% + (9.28% - 9%) (0.60 ÷ 0.40)
= 0.097 * 100
= 9.7%
Answer:
Direct labor efficiency variance= 0
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Direct labor 0.2 hours $ 35 per hour. During June, Heavy Products produced and sold 16,000 containers using 3,200 direct manufacturing labor-hours at an average wage of $ 51.00 per hour.
Direct labor efficiency variance= (Standard Quantity - Aactual Q)*standard rate
Direct labor efficiency variance= (0.2*16,000 - 3,200)*35= 0
Answer:
May 24
Dr Retained earnings $1,500
Cr Cash $1,500
Being cash dividend paid to shareholders.
October 11
Dr Advertising Expense $1,000
Cr Cash $1,000
Being cash payment for monthly advertising expenses.
Explanation:
Rules:
Debit side:
Increase in asset
Increase in expense
Decrease in liability
Decrease in equity
Decrease in income or sales
Credit side:
Decrease in asset
Decrease in expense
Increase in liability
Increase in equity
Increase in income or sales
May 24
Dr Retained earnings $1,500
Cr Cash $1,500
Being cash dividend paid to shareholders.
October 11
Dr Advertising Expense $1,000
Cr Cash $1,000
Being cash payment for monthly advertising expenses.
Answer:
$3,700
Explanation:
Given that
Adjusted gross income for the year 2019 = $415,300
Children ages = 4, 7, and 18 as dependents
Based on the given information, Russ and Linda's total child and other dependent credit for the year 2019 is
= (Maximum amount per qualifying child + non-refundable tax credit) - (deductible amount × age)
= ($2,000 × 2 + $500) - ($50 × 16)
= $4,500 - $800
= $3,700
After $400,000 the $50 is decreased for each and every $1,000
Answer:
<em>Disparate-impact discrimination</em>
Explanation:
As we can see in the given scenario, that Nell believes that the test has an unintentionally discriminatory effect as he fails in the test taken by the company, so this discriminating act that was made by the Origami Paper Corporation is a <u>disparate-impact discrimination</u>.
<em>Because as we know that if someone is been discriminated unintentionally, then it comes under disparate-impact discrimination.</em>