Production possibilities curve between the two goods will be a straight, downward-sloping line if the opportunity cost rise.
<h3>What is production possibilities curve?</h3>
The production possibilities curve serves as graph that display the relationship between the resources and the output that can be produced.
Therefore, when the opportunity cost that exists between two goods, there will be. downward slope as regards the production possibilities curve.
Learn more about production possibilities curve at;
brainly.com/question/2601596
#SPJ1
Answer:
By producing a product with a lower opportunity cost
Explanation:
Given that the law of comparative advantage states that a nation is better off when it produces goods and services for which it has a comparative advantage.
To obtain a comparative advantage means "By producing a product with a lower opportunity cost."
This implies that while many nations can produce the same products, a particular nation will have the comparative advantage over other nations if its opportunity cost of producing that specific product is quite lower compared to other nations that ks capable of producing the same product.
Answer:
inter-organizational system
Explanation:
An inter-organizational system refers to the network amongst organizations, or "sharing communications system between such a number of companies." The most common method of inter-organizational systems is electronic communications exchange, which allows for the immediate desktop-to-computer transmission of information.
The inter-organizational rules allow knowledge exchange to be streamlined between companies in terms of achieving a planned supply-chain management structure that allows profitable businesses to evolve. It facilitates customer needs planning and products and services distribution.
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": it yields a larger variety of solutions than generally available using an LP method.
Explanation:
In Goal Programming (GP), the MINIMAX objective aims to minimize the maximum deviation from any type of objective. This approach carries a larger number of solutions compared to the Linear Programming (LP) method which mainly focuses on assigning more weight to each goal in the objective function.
