Both presidentialism and parliamentarism are unequivocally democratic, but each of these regimes leads to different political consequences.
The great difference is that in parliamentarism the executive branch is composed of a president or a monarch, head of state, with limited powers, and a government appointed by Parliament, which at any time can censor. In presidentialism, however, the head of state and government coincide in the same person, are not subject to parliamentary censure and the Legislative Branch is limited to the area of law making.
Therefore, in presidentialism, voters elect the head of government (who in turn is head of state); instead, in parliamentarism, the head of government is appointed by the head of state, who is voted by the people.
<span>African Americans didn't really have a political status because they weren't allowed to vote,or run for office for quite some time. When slavery ended and even as time went on African Americans didn't have a lot of money. Of course that has changed now. So their economic status also wasn't very good and a lot of them in the late 1800s and early 1900s worked on farms as sharecroppers since the majority of them were uneducated and were in poverty.
</span>
William became king after the battle of hastings