This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
Which of the following statements is the inverse of "If you do not understand geometry, then you do not know how to reason deductively."?
A. If you reason deductively, then you understand geometry.
B. If you do not reason deductively, then you understand geometry.
C. If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively.
Answer:
The inverse of that statement is:
C. If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively.
Explanation:
To determine the inverse of a statement, we must negate both the hypothesis and the conclusion. In this case, the hypothesis is "if you do not understand geometry." It is already a negative sentence, which means its negation is "if you understand geometry." The same goes for the conclusion "then you do not know how to reason deductively." Its negation is "then you [know how to ] reason deductively." Putting them together, we have "If you understand geometry, then you reason deductively." - letter C
The answer is " when you need to make information easier to understand" i have grad point and it said it was correct
The jessamine show to the reader is that she is losing interest in her relationship with Arobin.
Edna is no extended in complete control of her situation.
<h3>What realization is Edna beginning with?</h3>
- Edna begins to learn that she is an independent being, individual, and woman. She no longer wishes to be an extension of her husband, or any man.
- Rather, she wishes to create her own choices. As a man tries to tend to her needs, Edna grows increasingly dissatisfied with the ideas of a misogynist society.
<h3>Why did the author most probably choose an omniscient narrator?</h3>
The author uses an all-knowing narrator to reveal the thoughts and motivations of both characters. She had not much of anything to say to her father, for that point; but he did not antagonize her.
To learn more about Edna, refer
brainly.com/question/16557938
#SPJ4
