Answer:
Anthropogenic climate changes stress the importance of understanding why people harm the environment despite their attempts to behave in climate friendly ways. This paper argues that one reason behind why people do this is that people apply heuristics, originally shaped to handle social exchange, on the issues of environmental impact. Reciprocity and balance in social relations have been fundamental to social cooperation, and thus to survival, and therefore the human brain has become specialized by natural selection to compute and seek this balance. When the same reasoning is applied to environment-related behaviors, people tend to think in terms of a balance between “environmentally friendly” and “harmful” behaviors, and to morally account for the average of these components rather than the sum. This balancing heuristic leads to compensatory green beliefs and negative footprint illusions—the misconceptions that “green” choices can compensate for unsustainable ones. “Eco-guilt” from imbalance in the moral environmental account may promote pro-environmental acts, but also acts that are seemingly pro-environmental but in reality more harmful than doing nothing at all. Strategies for handling problems caused by this cognitive insufficiency are discussed.
Explanation:
Answer:
The complete adjective clause in the sentence is: "which is not a required course."
Explanation:
<u>A dependent adjective clause is a group of words containing a subject and a verb whose purpose is to modify a noun or a pronoun by providing further description or information about it.</u> In other words, it functions as an adjective. <u>Adjective clauses are often introduced by relative pronouns such as who, which, or that. Having that explanation in mind, in the sentence " I elected to take astronomy, which is not a required course," the complete adjective clause is "which is not a required course." It is modifying the noun "astronomy", providing more information about it.</u>
Sung, played, have, go/went, works, queued, wore
A sense of oppression and domination
Answer:
Shall continue to
Explanation:
The author's claim is that students should have more recess time. That is the point he/she is trying to prove. "Without more recess time" means "if the students don't have more recess time." The answer is not 'will,' because the author is trying to prove that students are already struggling with their problems and won't get better unless they have more recess time. It is not 'might,' because that is still negative for their point that students should have more recess time to not struggle with their problems. It is 'shall continue to' because the author is proving that students are already struggling with problems and will continue to struggle without more recess time.
