The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You did not include references, texts, or the context of your questions. Does it refer to a documentary? A journal?
However, trying to help and doing some research, we can say the following.
The use of the illusionist analogy in describing the political and corporate deniers of global warming is a case of irresponsibility in dealing with serious scientific issues that have to be only referred to by researchers, scientists, and specialists. Not vague entertainers, as is the case of magician Jammy Ian Swiss.
When making a documentary, the Director has to include different approaches to make it interesting. But the voices included have to be professionals that have something valid to share regarding the issue at hand; in this case, global warming.
Otherwise, the main purpose of the research can be distorted by opinions and beliefs that have nothing to do with science. And this could bias the ideas and confuse the audience.
