C because there’s not enough conflict in this scenario
Answer: It is my claim that disability prejudice has been viewed through the lens of prejudices such as anti-Semitism, racism, feminism and homophobia – intolerances that may not be pre-existing, but have been generally recognized and theorized earlier in time.
Explanation:
In many ways, this collection of papers on the burgeoning field of national, regional and international instruments directed towards the redress of disability discrimination is really about the existence of disability prejudice. Most of the papers focus on practical or theoretical issues raised by the laws themselves, or the jurisprudential, social and political choices that shape the drafting and enactment of laws. Nonetheless, every paper is built on the conviction that disability prejudice is a fundamental force behind the exclusion of people with disabilities from a myriad of social and economic opportunities, and one author in particular writes in detail about the personal and systemic consequences of persistent disability prejudice and stereotypes
I would choose the last choice, D. Adverbial.
Adverbial phrases include two or more words that serve as adverbs. So "in an hour or two" can be classified as an adverb phrase.
Esawar Prasad's article “The Future of Money” is published in a magazine. According to the article, the nodes are used to store and share transactional records. Thus, option b is accurate.
<h3>What is blockchain in bitcoin?</h3>
Bitcoin is digital money, and blockchain is the log not centralized for the dealings that happen across the network. They do not require any central authority to clear the transactions.
Nodes and blocks are an integral part of the blockchain that stores the data and are interconnected to run the core of the cryptocurrency. The transactional information is stored and encrypted in the nodes and blocks of the blockchain.
Therefore, option b. node share information in the form of blocks is accurate.
Learn more about blockchain and cryptocurrency here:
brainly.com/question/23956699
#SPJ1
Actions can hold people accountable on how they produce their feelings. If someone were to “madly” yell at someone that they are in a argument with. They can end up saying harsh things or doing harsh things. That can hold them accountable. Again how I said “actions, how they produce their feelings”. Is showing that depending on how the person feels it can be associated with their actions!
