1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Doss [256]
3 years ago
12

Suppose you want to realize a future value of $150,000 in 30 years on an investment you make. The average annual rate of return

is 8.75%. What will be the present value of your investment? A. $163,125 B. $1,857,673 C. $12,112 D. $150,000
Business
1 answer:
tekilochka [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

PV= $12,111.93 = $12,112

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Future Value (FV)= $150,000

Interest rate (i)= 8.75% = 0.0875

Number of periods (n)= 30

<u>To calculate the present value (PV), we need to use the following formula:</u>

PV= FV/(1+i)^n

PV= 150,000 / (1.0875^30)

PV= $12,111.93

You might be interested in
The fund has not borrowed any funds, but its accrued management fee with the portfolio manager currently totals $25,000. There a
kvv77 [185]

Answer:

$9.79

Explanation:

The computation of the  net asset value of the fund is shown below:

Net asset value of the fund = Equity ÷ Total outstanding shares

where,

Equity

= Total assets - total liabilities

where,

Total assets equal to

= 220,000 shares × $35 + 320,000 shares × $40 + 420,000 shares × $15 + 620,000 shares × $20

= $7,700,000 + $12,800,000 + $6,300,000 + $12,400,000

= $39,200,000

And, liabilities is $25,000

So, the net asset value of the fund equal to

= ($39,200,000 - $25,000) ÷ (4,000,000 shares)

= $9.79

7 0
3 years ago
As part of his overall stock portfolio, jason bought a few shares of facebook. in this context, he would best be described as __
larisa86 [58]
<span>As part of his overall stock portfolio, Jason bought a few shares of Facebook. in this context, he would best be described as shareholder of facebook.</span>
5 0
4 years ago
sean, 17, a snowboarder, signs a long-term endorsement agreement for sportswear. he endorses the products and deposits his compe
Degger [83]

A settlement made with the aid of using a minor is frequently voidable, however a minor can most effective keep away from a settlement all through his or her minority popularity and for an inexpensive time after he reaches the age of majority.  After an inexpensive length of time, the settlement is deemed to be ratified and cannot be avoided.

  • Facts of the case: Sean, 17, a snowboarder, signs a long-term endorsement agreement for sportswear. At age 19, he wants to void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the deal at 17.
  • Rule of Law: Minor's Contracts are voidable at the option of Minor.
  • Analysis: Since, Minor's Contract is voidable at the option of the Minor who Signs the Contact can either honor the contract or void the contract. A minor can void a contract for lack of capacity, only when he is still under the age of majority. If a minor turn 18 i.e., After attaining Majority and hasn't done anything to void the contract, then the contract can no longer be voided.
  • Here, Sean has not done anything to void the contract on attaining the age of 18. So, he at the age of 19, cannot void the agreement by claiming that he lacked capacity when he signed the agreement at 17.
  • Decision: Sean Vs. Sportswear Company: In the light of the above provisions, a Court will not permit Sean to now void the agreement.

Learn more about minority popularity here:

brainly.com/question/14457086

#SPJ4

8 0
1 year ago
Which of the following is false? Economists who advocate discretionary monetary policy argue that it is more likely to achieve t
just olya [345]

Answer: None of the above

Explanation:

All of the above are correct.

For option A, Economists who advocate discretionary monetary policy do indeed believe that the monetary authority using this policy is more flexible to shape the best monetary policy to the existing circumstances.

Option B is also correct because Crowding out occurs when the government increases investment by borrowing which leaves less money for the private sector to borrow so they spend less. The government spent money here yet the private sector did not spend less so it is Zero Crowing out.

Option C by option B's explanation holds true because the entire amount the Government increased by was denied the private sector.

Option D is also true as not all Economists prefer rule-based monetary policy to discretionary monetary policy.

They are all true.

3 0
3 years ago
Select the correct answers.
telo118 [61]

Answer:

I think

hand-eye coordination and

customer service

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Help me plz with this. Look at the file its for Career Exploration
    12·1 answer
  • What is the initial investment outlay for the spectrometer, that is, what is the Year 0 project cash flow
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following things can help you get a lower interest rate when you receive a loan?
    7·1 answer
  • How can you determine the cost of something without concidering mearly its monitary value
    10·1 answer
  • What is the measure of the ease of converting an asset into its full cash value?
    15·2 answers
  • A company reported the following amounts at the end of the year total sales revenue = 550000; sales discounts = $12,000; sales r
    13·1 answer
  • People who are part of the project team need to understand project management because they Multiple Choice Need to understand th
    7·1 answer
  • A borrower is interested in comparing the monthly payments on two otherwise equivalent 30 year FRMs. Both loans are for $100,000
    6·1 answer
  • A Trustworthy Source is credible, reliable &amp; relevant.<br><br> True<br> False
    14·1 answer
  • In a planned economy, prices of commodities are controlled by _________.
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!