The 3/5 Compromise were more beneficial to which Colonies?

History

1 answer:

quester [9]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Three-fifths compromise, compromise agreement between delegates from the Northern and the Southern states at the United States Constitutional Convention (1787) that three-fifths of the slave population would be counted for determining direct taxation and representation in the House of Representatives.

BUT IT WAS MORE BENEFICAL FOR THE SOUTHERN

You might be interested in

EXTRA POINTS AND BRAINIEST IF CORRECT!!!

Andrews [41]

Answer:

Johnson is the right answer

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

What do John Carver and William Bradford have in common?

lukranit [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

He governed Plymouth colony and died after the Pilgrims landed and was succeeded by William Bradford

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The events of "bleeding Kansas" (1854) can mostly be attributed to

fomenos

The answer is C. The. competition between farmers trying to settle land. Hope this helps

3 0

3 years ago

Read this excerpt from a summary of events in Srebrenica.

avanturin [10]

Answer:

D. Most people never learned the fate of their loved ones

Explanation:

The summary of the story is that this woman was able to get to know of the gory details surrounding the way that her husband died. She was able to learn of the ways that she died following a Serbian attack from the first cousin of her husband.

4 0

2 years ago

What are the four major social groups in the varana

Sergeu [11.5K]

The 4 major social groups in the Varana System are Bramham(Priest), Kshatriya(warrior), Vaishya(trader), and Shudra(slaves)

3 0

3 years ago