<span>Congress controls presidents
Others supported by pop vote by the citizens</span>
Answer:
Why is Columbus day celebrated?
Explanation:
Arguments:
- Mercantilism. Was it worth it? Was the introduction of these things to North America worth it?
- Was Christopher Columbus a good or bad person?
- Should we celebrate Columbus day? Why or why not?
There really isn't any main argument for the Columbian Exchange other than is Christopher Columbus a good person? I say no but someone might argue that he contributed to things historically. Sure but anyone could have done that. Christopher Columbus is just an explorer and he didn't even discover North America.
Answer:
The difference between SAT and ACT is that ACT includes a science section and SAt doesn't. SAT does scientific test skills through some other sections.
Explanation:
There are good arguments on both sides as to when and how fast to reopen the economy. In my view, the answer will vary state by state and industry by industry. There’s also an enormous amount of uncertainty as to exactly how to determine the optimal policy. In that environment, there’s a great advantage to having these decisions be made at as local a level as possible. Thus, while I suspect that Sweden’s current policy is not optimal, that Nordic country is doing a great service to Europe by providing evidence on the consequences of an alternative policy path.
Giving too much power to any one person is dangerous, especially when that person might be influenced by political considerations that go beyond the best interest of the country as a whole:
That’s not to say Trump’s views are necessary wrong; rather that the procedure he uses to reach decisions is not reliable. Thus I’d still favor local control even if in one particular case you could convince me that the views of the person who happened to be president at the time were superior to the views of the average mayor or governor. In the long run, competition between states will produce better governance than central planning.
Answer:
There are trivial similarities — both were tall.
Somewhat more significantly, they both had a reputation for honesty over and above other presidents. “Honest Abe,” and George “I cannot tell a lie” Washington after he (supposedly) chopped down a cherry tree.
But the most important similarity is this: Both of them were successful war leaders who had a strong instinct against war and in favor of peace. Evidence for this is:
Washington — Urged by Hamilton and Jefferson to support England and France, respectively, Washington forged a policy of neutrality and avoiding foreign wars. Presidents Adams and Jefferson eventually followed suit.
Lincoln — In his one term as U.S. Congressman, Lincoln voted against the Mexican American War, a war so popular that Lincoln failed to get re-elected because of this vote.
In this respect, Washington and Lincoln were not unique — they were joined in this quality by Franklin D. Roosevelt (and some might add Woodrow Wilson).
Ironically, these were among the most successful war leaders in history, but their biggest wish in each case was to have a country, or a world, without war.
One last thing: Washington and Lincoln both tried to be uniters, not dividers. George W Bush said it, but Washington and Lincoln meant it.